RECLAIM YOUR WORLD

The United Nations and the United States have said that they are going to collaborate to form a global police force, bypassing Congress and any Constitutional laws, in order to tackle “violent extremism”.

Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced the plans at the United Nations on Wednesday, saying that her office would work with numerous American cities to form the Strong Cities Network (SCN).

via UN Announces Global Police Force – Welcome To 1984 | Your News Wire.

YeaH..Let’s call it Full Spectrum Dominance
Nobody needs to read Zbigniew “Grand Chessboard” Brzezinski’s 1997 opus to know US foreign policy revolves around one single overarching theme: prevent – by all means necessary – the emergence of a power, or powers, capable of constraining Washington’s unilateral swagger, not only in Eurasia but across the world.

The Pentagon carries the same message embedded in newspeak: the Full Spectrum Dominance doctrine.

via You Want War? Russia is Ready for War.

I think, first of all, diplomacy is always good. It is a very good sign that John Kerry actually went to Moscow, made the effort to go out there and had these high-level meetings. I think it is something very positive. However, I don’t want to get ahead of ourselves here because policy doesn’t change on a dime. But what is the reason for this apparent shift, I think the facts on the grounds have changed in places like – particularly – Syria.

via ‘Washington has gone from ‘regime change’ to ‘political transition’ in Syria, but we are not stupid’ — RT Op-Edge.

Emergency meeting to be held after U.S. gave air cover to ISIS, attacked Russian coalition — Puppet Masters — Sott.net.

The US has categorically denied that any of its aircraft were involved. It has admitted that its aircraft were in the area, but says that they carried out an air strike 55 km away.

The Russians say that is true. However, they also say that it is not the whole truth.

The Russians say that in addition to the US aircraft, two pairs of aircraft – in other words four aircraft in total – from two other countries that are also members of the US led coalition were also flying at the time of the air strike over Deir az-Zor.

The Russians have not actually said it was these aircraft that carried out the air strike. However, they have pointed out that the US has failed to admit to the presence of these aircraft. They are asking why?

via Did Members of the US-Led Coalition Carry Out an Air Strike to Help ISIS? Russia Implies They Did.

Als wij onze kranten open slaan dan zou je kunnen gaan denken dat alleen ongecoördineerde aanvallen van de illegale coalitie nut hebben in Syrië. Voor mensen die de strijd om Syrië al een tijdje volgen is het gesneden koek dat luchtaanvallen alleen nut hebben als je ze opvolgt of begeleidt met grondtroepen. Nu, de enige partij die grondtroepen aanwezig heeft is het Syrische leger. Niet geheel ontoevallig coördineert het Syrische leger die aanvallen met de Russen. Dit samen met de inlichtingen vanuit Rusland, Syrië en Iran maakt waarom de Islamitische Staat nu wel problemen heeft en zich zelf uit Syrië aan het terugtrekken is om in een andere door NATO kapot geschoten land een nieuw bolwerk op te zetten. Dat land heet Libië en de stad Sirte. Het is daarom niet onbelangrijk om te vermelden dat dit mede mogelijk gemaakt is door ons geweldige verdedigingssysteem met de naam NATO.

via De macht van de elite is gebroken! Deel 5.

Everything was going swimmingly until Putin stepped in.

While many in the West who have grown jaundiced at the obvious usurpation of our governments by outside interests ascribe almost saint-like motivations to Putin, I do not. He is a superb strategist. Exactly what he is strategizing for is not clear yet.

What is clear is that his move into Syria threw a spanner in the works of a status quo the US was quite happy with: growing terrorism and mayhem in Syria and spreading nicely to Europe.

Assad himself said a few days ago to the BBC (courtesy of Czech Television) that ISIS was growing smaller after Russian bombing intervention whereas moves by other countries served only to strengthen ISIS and increase their recruitment.

He added: “The facts are telling.”

So what do the facts tell?

They tell us that Russia is the only country involved to date which has the removal of ISIS as an actual goal.

Russia is also the only country with a legitimate mandate under international law.

In addition, ISIS was most eloquently outed by author and journalist Gearóid Ó Colmáin on Russia Today as a US creation.

In this scenario, the reason for further western efforts in the region is looking increasingly like an attempt to prevent Russia from routing its assets or achieving the informational coup that would follow.

Why Is the West Falling Over Itself to Bomb Syria?.

So what we have now in effect is Turkey “violating” the borders of Iraq (remember those famous “17 seconds”?) Baghdad is actually part of the “4+1” coalition (Russia, Syria, Iran, Iraq, plus Hezbollah). Turkey knows it. The “incursion” is yet one more — serious — provocation. If Russia — and Iran — decide that’s one too many, Erdogan’s oil racket protecting tanks better get ready to meet their maker.

via What is Erdogan’s Game in Syria and Iraq?.

HERE IS THE BOTTOM LINE:  We in the United States cannot lead the world alone any longer, if we ever could.  Long before Paris, globalization and other developments have occurred that ended the mono-polar, US-dominated world.  That world is over.  A multi-polar world has emerged before our eyes, not just in Russia but in five or six capitals around the world.  Washington’s stubborn refusal to embrace this new reality has become part of the problem and not part of the solution.  This is where we are today …. even after Paris.

via Russia Expert Stephen Cohen Nails Terrorism, Syria, Ukraine and Russia.

The Pentagon wants to dramatically increase the funding of its European Reassurance Initiative ERI under the too-familiar pretext of protecting its European allies from the non-existent Moscow threat or, as Geoff Dyer put it, “to send a message to Russia.”The exact number has not been made public yet but the overall mood of the US defense agency seems to reflect a desire to increase tensions with Moscow, although the White House does not necessarily share this sentiment.”While details of the new budget have yet to be finalized, the comments by defense officials underline the deep skepticism within the Pentagon about Russia, even as the Obama administration attempts to find signs of common ground with Moscow over a political solution to the civil war in Syria,” Dyer observed.

via Too-Familiar Tune: Pentagon Plans to Boost Europe Budget to Counter Russia.