the “zika virus outbreak”…how is it that so many individual doctors are allowing this shrunken brain epidemic to be laid on zika? Is there no attending physician ANYWHERE who has another insight into the sudden onset of this unfortunate malady? Are they being instructed at “gunpoint” to auto-report zika when they see the shrunken brain in a newborn, or are they individually scratching their heads, reporting an un-diagnosed malady, and allowing WHO or its local agents to do the diagnosing? You’re doing the Lord’s work, Jim. Be extremely cautious, for such work has been known to get one nailed to a cross. J-Bird

My response: Obviously, my take on this is based on deductive logic which says

1. You can’t have a mild virus that never caused a problem with newborns suddenly hit a knife edge, starting in November suddenly, like a lightning strike and destroy 2400 newborns in a single country between November 1 and December 30 with absolutely none happening before. Because this cannot happen,

logical step 2: It has to be caused by something new, that was introduced while these women were pregnant. Because I happen to know a fair amount about random medical topics and am already up in arms over vaccines I knew variable 3: That in Latin America, all women are strongly encouraged to get various vaccines between 18 and 22 weeks of pregnancy.

If we have 2,400 freak occurences, which might happen to a country 10 times per year as a norm, suddenly strike like lightning and take out 2400 plus in only two months ( a 1,600 fold increase if you factor that into an entire upcoming year, and to make the numbers more obvious, that is a 160,000 percent increase,) there has to be a common binding factor causing it that is not any mosquito borne disease. It can’t be a mosquito borne disease because ZERO in October to 1,200 in November and 1,200 in December cannot happen that way.

If this was a mosquito borne zika virus problem, there would have been a trend – 5 in May, 30 in June, 100 in July, building up to what is happening now. The fact that did not build up to this final dreadful outcome proves there is something else causing this, and whoever spewed about Zika knows what it is, and that it is not Zika.The only common binding women specific transmission vector that could make this possible is the Tdap vaccine. Shrunken baby brain occurences would suddenly show up like someone flipping a switch 18 – 20 weeks after such a batch of vaccines got introduced into Brazil. 20 weeks is five months. That leaves the end of May, June, July, August, September, October, Bam-0, in November it suddenly shows up in live births.

They said Zika showed up in May. Math says something showed up in May but historical medical logic and precedent says it could not possibly be the zika virus.As far as “allowing a shrunken brain epidemic”, even if they figure out it is the Tdap vaccine (and I am sure many who can think are suspecting that, these people are not stupid) this scourge will continue for five and a half months after they shut it down. It is not a matter of allowing it, it is a matter of dealing with the consequences of an attack after being shot. The people pulling this scam may get away with it for a few more months, because people in the medical community tend to be overly trusting of those who call the shots, but beyond that they are going to have to start killing doctors until all that are smart enough to figure this out are eliminated.

It is rational to think they know that and are ready to do exactly that.I have top posted the Tdap vaccine scam so people who were on vacation when this first went up can find it.